Wednesday, January 07, 2009 -- 06:29 AM
Click here to return to the home page Your Town, Your Website!
Home Search Entertainment Marketplace Community Quick Connect:
Home
Search
   The Web
Bus. Directory
Event Calendar
Classifieds
Entertainment
   Dining
Hotels
Movies
Marketplace
   Directory
Finance
Automotive
Real Estate
Chamber
Advertise Here
Community
   Relocation
Calendar
Churches
Government
Obituaries
Schools
Tennessee Tech
Weather
Library
Doctors
Town Talk
   Polls
Email
News
Featured Sites
   Crossville.com
TnProperties.com

Reply

Title
Author
Email
  Notify me via email of responses to this message
Text
 

Posted by Mike Yarbrough
on January 16, 2003

You miss the point.

The police are here to protect the public. All too often they see their job as to protect themselves first, then the public. This aggressive tendency is what leads to killing innocent people and could have easily turned out this way here. This was not a case where officer Hall witnessed a crime personally. He assumed the worst instead of "hey this could be a mistake and an innocent family". Are the police under the impression that everyone is guilty?

He made a rash decision based on the fact that it’s just a dog with no regard for the physiological problems this family will carry for the rest of their lives. What do you think their child’s view of all police will be from now on?

Let me ask you this, is it now acceptable for the police to kill an innocent person rather than take a chance on getting hurt themselves? That mentality kind of flies in the face of public service doesn't it?

The next time it could be a child!



Questions or comments? Suggest a link? Contact us at: 
©2001-03